<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Glock 17 &#038; 19 Gen 5 Review: BRAND NEW!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gunivore.com/pistol/glock-17-19-gen-5-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gunivore.com/pistol/glock-17-19-gen-5-review/</link>
	<description>Bringing You Honest, Reliable, and Engaging Firearm News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2020 10:14:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.6.10</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Sam M		</title>
		<link>https://gunivore.com/pistol/glock-17-19-gen-5-review/#comment-17142</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2019 09:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gunivore.com/?p=6533#comment-17142</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gunivore.com/pistol/glock-17-19-gen-5-review/#comment-17045&quot;&gt;Tuco Ramirez&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi, Thanks for reaching out - I appreciate your honesty and experience. In terms of their performance, there&#039;s absolutely nothing wrong with Glocks, which is why they&#039;re so popular for service firearms. Nonetheless, I never really fell in love with them outside of their dependability (which is no small matter). For the most part, it&#039;s just my stubbornness and personal taste why I don&#039;t prefer Glocks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gunivore.com/pistol/glock-17-19-gen-5-review/#comment-17045">Tuco Ramirez</a>.</p>
<p>Hi, Thanks for reaching out &#8211; I appreciate your honesty and experience. In terms of their performance, there&#8217;s absolutely nothing wrong with Glocks, which is why they&#8217;re so popular for service firearms. Nonetheless, I never really fell in love with them outside of their dependability (which is no small matter). For the most part, it&#8217;s just my stubbornness and personal taste why I don&#8217;t prefer Glocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tuco Ramirez		</title>
		<link>https://gunivore.com/pistol/glock-17-19-gen-5-review/#comment-17045</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tuco Ramirez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2019 00:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gunivore.com/?p=6533#comment-17045</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sam,

Enjoyed reading you review. While i’ve Only shot a hand full of Glock gen fives, I thought they were pretty good, mostly in the grip and trigger.  I started shooting Glocks about 1997 when I was issued one. I was suspicious at first, but, have been carrying them ever since. My department has purchases H&#038;K, Berretas and two Sigs. Lucky for me we have an option of what to carry, I like the Glock 17 and 26. Most recently, we are approved to carry Sig 320’s.  Again, I am skeptical, two have broken so far...my Glocks, maybe not the flavor of the month, both with tens of thousands of rounds through each, soldier on!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam,</p>
<p>Enjoyed reading you review. While i’ve Only shot a hand full of Glock gen fives, I thought they were pretty good, mostly in the grip and trigger.  I started shooting Glocks about 1997 when I was issued one. I was suspicious at first, but, have been carrying them ever since. My department has purchases H&amp;K, Berretas and two Sigs. Lucky for me we have an option of what to carry, I like the Glock 17 and 26. Most recently, we are approved to carry Sig 320’s.  Again, I am skeptical, two have broken so far&#8230;my Glocks, maybe not the flavor of the month, both with tens of thousands of rounds through each, soldier on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
