<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Kel-Tec P-F9 Review	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gunivore.com/pistol/kel-tec-p-f9-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gunivore.com/pistol/kel-tec-p-f9-review/</link>
	<description>Bringing You Honest, Reliable, and Engaging Firearm News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 14:22:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.6.10</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Art jones		</title>
		<link>https://gunivore.com/pistol/kel-tec-p-f9-review/#comment-7928</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 17:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gunivore.com/?p=3229#comment-7928</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gunivore.com/pistol/kel-tec-p-f9-review/#comment-7924&quot;&gt;Sam M&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks Sam for your quick reply, I think I will get one!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gunivore.com/pistol/kel-tec-p-f9-review/#comment-7924">Sam M</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks Sam for your quick reply, I think I will get one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sam M		</title>
		<link>https://gunivore.com/pistol/kel-tec-p-f9-review/#comment-7924</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 10:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gunivore.com/?p=3229#comment-7924</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gunivore.com/pistol/kel-tec-p-f9-review/#comment-7915&quot;&gt;Art jones&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Art, 
We&#039;re glad you enjoyed our feature. 
Kel-Tecs have a tendency to be a bit snappy, but if you&#039;re comfortable with a 38 spl. J-Frame and .40 Cal Shield then you should be able to manage with the PF9. Follow-up shots are pretty solid, considering it&#039;s a 9mm. You may also want to consider the Taurus Millennium G2.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gunivore.com/pistol/kel-tec-p-f9-review/#comment-7915">Art jones</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Art,<br />
We&#8217;re glad you enjoyed our feature.<br />
Kel-Tecs have a tendency to be a bit snappy, but if you&#8217;re comfortable with a 38 spl. J-Frame and .40 Cal Shield then you should be able to manage with the PF9. Follow-up shots are pretty solid, considering it&#8217;s a 9mm. You may also want to consider the Taurus Millennium G2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Art jones		</title>
		<link>https://gunivore.com/pistol/kel-tec-p-f9-review/#comment-7915</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2018 22:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gunivore.com/?p=3229#comment-7915</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Sam,
Thanks for a great review!
I know recoil is a subjective thing but is the recoil close to a jframe with regular 38 special ammo or would you say closer to plus p ammo. I have shot a shield in 40 cal and had no issues. I am trying to decide if I should get one. I have a p32 Keltec and love it. Any input would be greatly appreciated!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sam,<br />
Thanks for a great review!<br />
I know recoil is a subjective thing but is the recoil close to a jframe with regular 38 special ammo or would you say closer to plus p ammo. I have shot a shield in 40 cal and had no issues. I am trying to decide if I should get one. I have a p32 Keltec and love it. Any input would be greatly appreciated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
