Comments on: SCCY CPX-2 Review

By: gary webb

gary webb — Sat, 11 Jan 2020 17:35:48 +0000

cant register my holster warranty because can not find my order number.

By: Brian

Brian — Mon, 31 Dec 2018 21:44:09 +0000

I owned one and the (my opinion) really bad trigger wasn’t for me.

The problem (this one’s a fact) was it hurt my trigger finger. I never knew exactly what caused the pain, but with small/medium hands, the long reach for the trigger, the long reset and the snappy recoil, something caused my finger to hurt every time I shot it just a few shots in. It was nice looking, dead nuts reliable, easy to carry and had generous (10+1) capacity. If the trigger shape were different, the reach distance a tiny bit shorter, the pull weight closer to 6 lbs than 10, I’d love it. But I sold it and don’t regret it. It’s a good pistol, but it’s not for everyone, apparently including me.

By: Bundeswehr

Bundeswehr — Tue, 28 Aug 2018 21:33:53 +0000

Nice review.
I like the sccy cpx-2 too. It is a reliable gun since I have it back from fixing some stuff.
Why is it not more known? I’ll think the sccy is very known, more that we really think of. May be some kits and keyboard commanders find the sccy not Tactical enough. One is fore sure you can’t make pre-puberty girls giggling on a campus flashing a Sccy.
I really think the Sccy and the Taurus PT 709/111 G2/c/s series very known under real EDC carriers.
Just think there was a shoting and the police takes your 1100 Hk, Sig to the evidence locker.
Oh you don’t carry for self defense? OK……
I normally laugh when people mean that a Sccy or Taurus or Ruger would be guns for people that have no money. Think about that, Rich people have money because they don’t spend it. So I am not rich but I like to spend my money on traveling. Guns for protecting it’s a tool. I have a hammer in my tool-box that has no Brand on it but it works since 25 years.