<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Walther PPS M2 Review: Popular, Proficient, &#038; Sexy	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gunivore.com/pistol/walther-pps-m2-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gunivore.com/pistol/walther-pps-m2-review/</link>
	<description>Bringing You Honest, Reliable, and Engaging Firearm News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 01:14:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.6.12</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom D		</title>
		<link>https://gunivore.com/pistol/walther-pps-m2-review/#comment-59896</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 01:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gunivore.com/?p=8340#comment-59896</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great pistol, very nice review. Get rid of &quot;Besides for...&quot; in this and your other reviews and you&#039;re golden! Just &quot;Besides...&quot; works everywhere you&#039;ve used it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great pistol, very nice review. Get rid of &#8220;Besides for&#8230;&#8221; in this and your other reviews and you&#8217;re golden! Just &#8220;Besides&#8230;&#8221; works everywhere you&#8217;ve used it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert Sikes		</title>
		<link>https://gunivore.com/pistol/walther-pps-m2-review/#comment-44385</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Sikes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 03:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gunivore.com/?p=8340#comment-44385</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nice pistol. Mine did not, however, care too much for Blazer 115 grain aluminum-case ammunition. I just took it to the range for the first time this afternoon and discovered that as long as I run brass-case ammo (mine was 124 grain JHP Federal Hydra-Shok) it ran flawlessly. My PPS M2 9MM had difficulties with failures to eject with at least one round on almost every magazine. I was concerned, so I dumped the aluminum and went strictly with the more expensive defense ammo. There wasn&#039;t a single problem as soon as the better ammo was used. Other than its propensity to be picky about the ammunition, the pistol was great! Tight groups at 7 to 10 yards, and recoil was easily managed. The trigger, although not quite on par with that of the PPQ, was just fine for the PPS and the job it&#039;s built for. It broke smooth at probably around the six-pound mark, and the reset was just a tad longer than I&#039;d like, All in all, this is one fine conceal-carry pistol. It doesn&#039;t break the bank either, and that&#039;s always a positive.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice pistol. Mine did not, however, care too much for Blazer 115 grain aluminum-case ammunition. I just took it to the range for the first time this afternoon and discovered that as long as I run brass-case ammo (mine was 124 grain JHP Federal Hydra-Shok) it ran flawlessly. My PPS M2 9MM had difficulties with failures to eject with at least one round on almost every magazine. I was concerned, so I dumped the aluminum and went strictly with the more expensive defense ammo. There wasn&#8217;t a single problem as soon as the better ammo was used. Other than its propensity to be picky about the ammunition, the pistol was great! Tight groups at 7 to 10 yards, and recoil was easily managed. The trigger, although not quite on par with that of the PPQ, was just fine for the PPS and the job it&#8217;s built for. It broke smooth at probably around the six-pound mark, and the reset was just a tad longer than I&#8217;d like, All in all, this is one fine conceal-carry pistol. It doesn&#8217;t break the bank either, and that&#8217;s always a positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sam M		</title>
		<link>https://gunivore.com/pistol/walther-pps-m2-review/#comment-23204</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 06:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gunivore.com/?p=8340#comment-23204</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://gunivore.com/pistol/walther-pps-m2-review/#comment-23198&quot;&gt;Rick J Weisser&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Rick, thanks for reaching out. The PPS has 3 automatic safeties, namely a trigger safety, QuickSafe feature, and an internal firing pin safety (plus an integrated passive drop safety and loaded chamber indicator).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://gunivore.com/pistol/walther-pps-m2-review/#comment-23198">Rick J Weisser</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Rick, thanks for reaching out. The PPS has 3 automatic safeties, namely a trigger safety, QuickSafe feature, and an internal firing pin safety (plus an integrated passive drop safety and loaded chamber indicator).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rick J Weisser		</title>
		<link>https://gunivore.com/pistol/walther-pps-m2-review/#comment-23198</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick J Weisser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 01:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gunivore.com/?p=8340#comment-23198</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I just bought a pps.  Doesn&#039;t have a noticable safety.  can anyone explain this?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought a pps.  Doesn&#8217;t have a noticable safety.  can anyone explain this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
